Welcome to Clip from Spiral logo

Interactive video lesson plan for: Kenji Yoshino: Diversity Does Not Mean Having to Choose Between Identity and Inclusion

Activity overview:

Author and academic Kenji Yoshino describes the difference between passing and covering, and how companies will sometimes employ a myopic form of diversity inclusion that necessitates the abandonment of personal identity. Yoshino is the co-author of a new paper titled "Uncovering Talent: A New Model of Inclusion."

Read more at BigThink.com: http://goo.gl/Z6Hbtt

Follow Big Think here:
YouTube: http://goo.gl/CPTsV5
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/BigThinkdotcom
Twitter: https://twitter.com/bigthink

Kenji Yoshino: Diversity inclusion is something that has been around in companies for decades now and generally people think of it as diversity and inclusion. But I would actually challenge that given that I think that historically we’ve seen diversity or inclusion rather than diversity and inclusion. And what I mean by that is that companies really want inclusion but they often predicate that inclusion on the surrender of various forms of diversity that people bring to the table. So the idea is that if you modulate your outsider identity to adopt mainstream behaviors then you’ll be included. And so it puts people to this tragic choice between their identity and inclusion. And that’s where I think that companies have missed the mark or need to update their practices.

So I look at the notion of authenticity through Erving Goffman’s term covering. So Erving Goffman is a sociologist who wrote back in the 1960s, and his notion of covering was the way in which we all modulate our identities in order to be accepted by the mainstream. So when I first came across this term my immediate response was how does covering differ from passing. And one of the great things about Goffman is that he’s such a good writer that when you’re reading him you almost feel like you’re talking to him. So the next paragraph was, you know, the astute reader may be asking himself how covering differs from passing. And he gives the example of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt. And Roosevelt used to always make sure that he was seated behind a table before his cabinet entered. So he wasn’t passing because everybody knew that he had a motor function disability and was confined to a wheelchair.

But he was covering, making sure his more conventional presidential qualities – I am white, I am a man, were in the foreground. And his last conventional presidential quality, I’m a person with a disability was in the background of the interaction. And whether it’s on the basis of race or gender or sexual orientation or religion or disability, all of us engage in these practices where we downplay the things that push us outside of the mainstream. And that, as our study again shows, comes at a significant cost to people’s sense of self. So, you know, I’m a rubber hits the road kind of guy so even if we find a high incidence of this practice of covering which we found that 61 percent of individuals reported covering, I kind of thought well, I don’t care about this unless people report that it’s harmful to them. If people say I do it but it’s not a big deal then I don’t care. But 60 to 73 percent of individuals depending on the particular axis of covering that we looked at said that this was somewhat to extremely detrimental to their sense of self. So that’s something that we really need to be attentive to if we want people to really flourish in whatever organization they inhabit.

The prevalence of covering is something that we often get asked about and the distribution of which groups cover more and which groups cover less. And I have both an intuitive and an counterintuitive answer to that. So the intuitive answer is, you know, groups that are seen as struggling to make it into the mainstream have a much higher reported incidence of covering. So 83 percent of LGB respondents in our survey, lesbian, gay and bisexual, respondents in our survey reported covering; 79 percent of blacks both African Americans and non-nationals; 66 percent of women. So that array I think will strike many listeners as intuitive. But on the other hand we also found that 45 percent of straight white men reported covering on at least one of the dimensions that we articulate in our paper. And that was obviously a really interesting statistic to us and so we dug in more deeply to think about well what are the ways in which straight white men who are traditionally seen as outside of the inclusion paradigm, what are the ways in which they cover. And we discovered everything from I have to cover my religion to I have to cover my political affiliation.

Directed / Produced by Jonathan Fowler, Elizabeth Rodd, and Dillon Fitton

Tagged under: Kenji Yoshino (Academic),Gender,Identity,LGBT,Equality,Xenophobia,Franklin D. Roosevelt (US President),Human Resources (Industry),Workplace,Business,Sociology,Gay,Lesbian,Feminist,Pride,Big Think,BigThink.,BigThink,EDU,Education,Lifelong Learning,Skills

Clip makes it super easy to turn any public video into a formative assessment activity in your classroom.

Add multiple choice quizzes, questions and browse hundreds of approved, video lesson ideas for Clip

Make YouTube one of your teaching aids - Works perfectly with lesson micro-teaching plans

Play this activity

1. Students enter a simple code

2. You play the video

3. The students comment

4. You review and reflect

* Whiteboard required for teacher-paced activities

Share on:

Share Kenji Yoshino: Diversity Does Not Mean Having to Choose Between Identity and Inclusion on Google+ Share Kenji Yoshino: Diversity Does Not Mean Having to Choose Between Identity and Inclusion on Twitter Share Kenji Yoshino: Diversity Does Not Mean Having to Choose Between Identity and Inclusion on Facebook Pin Kenji Yoshino: Diversity Does Not Mean Having to Choose Between Identity and Inclusion Email Kenji Yoshino: Diversity Does Not Mean Having to Choose Between Identity and Inclusion

Ready to see what else Spiral logo can do?

With four apps, each designed around existing classroom activities, Spiral gives you the power to do formative assessment with anything you teach.


Carry out a quickfire formative assessment to see what the whole class is thinking


Create interactive presentations to spark creativity in class

Team Up

Student teams can create and share collaborative presentations from linked devices


Turn any public video into a live chat with questions and quizzes

1000s of teachers use Spiral to deliver awesome, engaging activities that capture students' understanding during lessons.

Now it's your turn Sign up

Spiral Reviews by Teachers and Digital Learning Coaches

Review of Spiral by teacher: Kathryn Laster @kklaster

Tried out the canvas response option on @SpiralEducation & it's so awesome! Add text or drawings AND annotate an image! #R10tech

Review of Spiral by teacher: Room 220 Math Stars @3rdgradeBCE

Using @SpiralEducation in class for math review. Student approved! Thumbs up! Thanks.

Review of Spiral by teacher: Miss Ord @ordmiss

Absolutely amazing collaboration from year 10 today. 100% engagement and constant smiles from all #lovetsla #spiral

Review of Spiral by teacher: Adam J. Stryker @strykerstennis

Students show better Interpersonal Writing skills than Speaking via @SpiralEducation Great #data #langchat folks!

Review of Spiral by teacher: Dr Ayla Göl @iladylayla

A good tool for supporting active #learning.

Review of Spiral by teacher: Brett Erenberg @BrettErenberg

The Team Up app is unlike anything I have ever seen. You left NOTHING out! So impressed!

Get the Clip Chrome Extension & Create Video Lessons in Seconds

Add Clip to Chrome